good teaching

this site is working document for committed teachers

Introduction to Theories of learning

Introduction to  Theories of learning

 

learing

 

Learning Theories in the Early Childhood Classroom

UntitledBy Nick Petten

Within the social constructivist theory, learning is explained as involving a complex interaction of interdependent social and individual processes that co-construct knowledge. The learner constructs his or her knowledge from a range of internal and external experiences where pre-existing schemas and knowledge are adapted to the newly acquired knowledge

In comparison to other theories of learning, such as behaviourism and cognitive constructivism, the effects on the learner are expanded to include the social setting where the learner is constructing the new knowledge, as well as, the social setting where existing knowledge was constructed. In relation to the early childhood classroom and the interaction of the learner and the teacher, the learner is perceived as being very active. For the proper retention and analysis of new knowledge, the learner will draw up older experiences of the same knowledge (schemas) and compare the two in order to create newer knowledge that integrates new and old.

2

The interaction between the learner and the social context is emphasized in the social constructivist theory of learning. Mental activity is inextricably bound to its social context (Wertsch, 1991). Vygotsky, who was an early adopter and promoter of social constructivism within education, continued to emphasize the socio-historical context in which the processes developed and functioned (Vygotsky, 1978). As such, not only was Vygotsky interested in the construction of knowledge in the individual, but also the sociology of knowledge.

 

3

 

Within the theory of Multiple Intelligences (MI) learning is explained as involving an interdependent functioning of multiple intelligences that accounts for all aspects of human cognition. Developed by Howard Gardner, the theory postulates that there are seven or more intelligences that each individual is born with and is needed to live life well (Smith, 2002, 2008). As people develop new knowledge, often these intelligences complement each other (Hatch, Gardner, 1989).

 

In MI theory, the learner is seen as an active participant in their own learning. When new knowledge is presented to the chid, the child will utilize different intelligences in order to synthesize and analyze the new information. This method of learning stands in contrast to the traditional view of intelligence testing using only two kinds of intelligences, linguistic and logical-mathematical.

 

 

 

 

 

 

What are the implications for the role of the teacher?

 

In social constructivism, the teacher is a co-constructor of knowledge with the child. Instead of lecturing or direct instructions, the teacher allows and guides the child to come to his or her own understanding of the material. A teacher in the early childhood classroom will aid and support the child in their own discovery and initiative through a concept called, the zone of proximal development (ZPD). The ZPD allows a child to tackle a problem that is sufficiently novel to attract and maintain a child’s attention, yet not so difficult that the solution cannot be perceived (Edwards, 2005). To expand this concept to the classroom, the teacher will ‘set up’ activities for students that are just beyond the students abilities and then guide and support the student to come to a solution themselves with minimal help from the teacher.

 

In MI theory, the role of the teacher is to take a broader view of learning to include all intelligences and consequently plan and deliver activities that will allow children to learn through an intelligence that they are strongest in. Taking this approach to learning, teachers are able to give their students extended opportunities to construct new knowledge that makes most sense to them and can therefore be readily applied to novel situations.

What is the role of the environment in the process of learning? What can we learn from these theories as educators of young children?

 

In social constructivism, the effects of the environment and the socio-historical context are crucial in understanding how children construct new knowledge. The cultural norms and acceptable methods of learning in a specific culture will heavily influence how education and learning is viewed as a whole and applied in the educational institution. The cultural norms are a consequence of generations of families that have set expectations for what children learn and at what stages of development it is appropriate to  learn it at.

Vygotsky placed major emphasis on the role of social contexts when children face and resolve cognitive conflicts that aid in learning (Vygotsky, 1978). Corsaro and Eder continued to emphasis that group work within the early childhood classroom often leads to conflict as each student brings a unique set of existing schemas, experiences, values and culturally-mediated beliefs to a joint activity (1990). Taking this perspective, children that live in diverse cultural settings will encounter many such conflicting situations, specifically within the classroom, that will increase the opportunities for the children to apply multiple cognitive strategies to resolve the conflict and enhance their learning.

Within MI theory, Gardner speaks about a concentric model of cognition that incorporates different levels of forces that affect how someone learns: personal forces, local forces, and cultural forces (Hatch and Gardner, 1993). Changes in forces at each of the levels will affect the changes that take place at other levels and will determine what the individual is capable of doing (Bronfenbrenner, 1979). As a consequence of this interdependence of cultural forces on learning and development, peers and adults (that represent the culture) will influence what intelligences take prominence over others.

What connections can you make between these theories and your personal understandings of learning and development?

My understandings of learning and development is that nothing happens in isolation. There is always a complexity of interactions as children learn and develop–interactions with peers, parents, teachers, the media, the community, the socio-political environment, et cetera. The social constructivist theory captures the notion that a child’s life involves a complexity of interactions and that this complexity must be viewed and analyzed in order develop a proper and effective early childhood educational curriculum. I also want to emphasize the notion of conflict as being crucial to a child’s development. When the process of conflict resolution is properly supported and guided by an experience educator as with the concept of ZPD and Rogoff’s guided participation (1990) the child has the best opportunities for a rich learning experience.

 

The theory of MI properly accounts for the fact that children learn in different ways and use different cognitive capabilities to construct knowledge. It also emphasizes the importance of using a diverse curriculum in the classroom that utilizes different subject areas such as music, fine arts and physical activities. For example, if a teacher is giving a lesson on the provinces of Canada, he or she can have students write a song about the provinces, draw the provinces on a map, or physically place themselves on a province on an enlarged map of Canada. Each method of learning in this case will appeal to the learning styles of different students.

What is your critic of these theories?

 

When developing a comprehensive curriculum for early childhood education, I would advice incorporating several theories of learning to account for some deficiencies of a particular theory. In social constructivism, there may be too much emphasis placed on the notion of ‘learning by doing’ and giving students unrestricted opportunities to discover knowledge within the classroom. Some learners may not have the cognitive capabilities to properly discover the educational opportunities in specific activities, for example, children that are developmentally delayed or have profound cognitive deficits.

 

If an early childhood educational curriculum completely accepts the MI theory, it would be very challenging to assess each child’s strengths and weaknesses in each intelligence and then plan and deliver a lesson plan. For something as simple as teaching the different provinces of Canada, it may be overwhelming for a teacher to organize all the material and time that it takes to incorporate seven different methods of learning. Apart from the implications of MI in the classroom, the theory of MI has been meet with much criticism from the research community. It has been cited to be untestable and there are issues around the criteria for each intelligence. Despite the criticism, there has been widespread acceptance of MI as a theory that has been applied to education institutions around the world.

What are the implications of these theories to practice in an early childhood classroom environment?

 

Vygotsky emphasized the social contributions to defining and resolving cognitive conflict (Vygotsky, 1978) and that conflict is an essential aspect of social constructivism and typically occurs in social situations. Conflict is viewed as a powerful method of learning as children compare their currently held assumptions and schemas to the conflicting situation and, consequently, adapt to resolve the conflict. A group activity within a classroom amongst children with unique and pre-existing schemas is often a source of conflict as the children attempt to collaborate on an exercise.

 

As opposed to Piaget, Vygotsky believed that learning leads development, which has important implications in the inclusive classroom for children with learning disabilities. Taking this view of child development, with sufficient instructions and social support (Mallory and New, 1994), every child is given the opportunity to lead their development, rather than falling into the pitfalls of a developmental diagnosis. The teacher that accepts a social constructivist model will understand that there are many different ways of learning and will utilize different teaching strategies with different students.

 

The theory of multiple intelligences follows the same framework as social constructivism where the focus is on the interdependence of social and individual processes in the co-construction of knowledge, but continues on to postulate that there are a number of distinct intelligences that can be developed within the individual.

 

In an early childhood education classroom, the child is not viewed as having a narrowly defined intelligence that only certain tests can measure, but instead can be viewed as having a number of intelligences that can be cultivated and developed using different teaching strategies. MI theory proposes that all seven intelligences are needed to live life well (Smith, 2002, 2008) and therefore teachers need to attend to all intelligences rather than the traditionally defined intelligences of reading and arithmetic.

 

Thinking skills help children be successful in school and life. The experiences we plan during preschool help children develop these skills, you  need to learn about ways to promote thinking skills.

 

  • Memory : Holding information for a short period of time. Children use working memory when they follow multi-step directions. For example: “Put your coat in your cubby, wash your hands, and meet me on the carpet.”
  • Self-Control : Planning our actions and resisting our impulses. Children use this skill when they refrain from snatching a toy. They also use this skill when they stop a favorite activity to begin a less enjoyable activity.
  • Mental Flexibility: Quickly shifting tasks and responding to new situations. Children use this skill when they try several different ways to work a puzzle or when they negotiate with another child.
  • Attention: Focusing on a task despite distractions.
  • Mental Representation: Substituting a symbol (picture, word, thought) for a concrete object. Children do this when they draw pictures of people they know. They might use lines or shapes for words.
  • Reasoning: Taking on another’s perspective and thinking through complex situations. Children do this when they role play or play “what if…” games.
  • Concept Acquisition and Classification: Creating categories to represent objects and ideas. Children classify objects as animals, people, etc. They also describe objects by size, color, or simple traits.

 

Now that you know the importance of thinking skills, you can do a lot to help children learn. Here is a short list of ways to support preschool children:

  • Model your own thinking skills. Think out loud. For example, you might say, “Hmm. I really wanted to paint this part of my picture purple, but Josie is using the purple paint. I think I’ll paint this part yellow instead.”
  • Find opportunities throughout the day to play “What if…?” games. Ask the children questions like, “What would we do if all of our chairs were gone?!” or “What if we run out of snack? What should we do?”
  • Give children lots of chances to explore concepts. Play games during transitions by asking children to line up based on some characteristics: “Everyone who is wearing blue jeans can line up” or “If you are wearing sandals, you can wash your hands.”

Encourage children to use self-control and recognize when they do! Say things like, “I know you were working really hard on that structure. It’s really hard to stop, but your mom is here. How about we put a sign on your structure and save it for tomorrow?”

 

Thinking — My child…

 

Is starting to recognize cause-and-effect relationships.

Understands words that relate one idea to another. (For example: if, why, when.)

Understands number and space concepts. (For example: more, less, bigger, in, under, behind.)

Thinks literally (and takes statements and questions at face value).

Is starting to develop logical thinking (and understands connections and consequences).

Grasps the concepts of past, present, and future.

Can follow a simple, three-part command.

Attempts to solve simple problems rather than rushing to ask for help.

Engages in fantasy play with dolls, people, and animals.

 

 

Learning — My child…

 

Can match two pictures that are alike.

Can put three pictures in a logical order.

Can recognize things that go together. (For example: a spoon and a fork.)

Can recognize, match, and name a circle, square, and triangle.

Can recognize, match, and name at least five colors.

Can repeat a simple pattern. (For example: step, step, hop – step, step, hop.)

Can complete simple puzzles.

 

 

Important information for teachers

BE Careful

Over generalizing  when could these red flags can be not true and teacher lack of skills or knowledge is the cause

Red Flags for Social-Emotional Development (3-4 years)

  • Doesn’t imitate other people
  • Constantly moves from one activity to another and is not able to stay at an activity for brief periods
  • Requires constant attention to stay at an activity
  • Doesn’t show any interest in other children
  • Doesn’t “show” things to other people
  • Extremely “rigid” about routines, becoming extremely upset when they are changed
  • Too passive, and doesn’t want to try things other children her age are doing
  • Has extreme difficulty waiting for items he wants

Red Flags for Social-Emotional Development (3 -7years)

  • She is not interested in pretend play
  • She has extreme difficulty separating from you
  • He is not starting or responding to simple interactions with other children
  • She is showing abnormal aggression
  • He shows extreme fears that interfere with daily activities
  • She is extremely “rigid” about routines

2 comments on “Introduction to Theories of learning

  1. salghnem
    January 6, 2014

    اولا اختاري احدى نظريات التعلم
    ثانيا و اجتبي على الاسئلة التالية بالشرح و النماذج و الفهم بمعنى اجري بحثك الخاص لفهم هذ اه لنظرية بعمق و تمعن يساعدك على استخدام تطبيقاتها

    1-What is learning ما هو التعلم
    2-how does learning happenكيف يحدث التعلم
    3-What are the most critical elements of leaning according to the theory
    ماهي اهم مقومات النظرية
    4-What are the abilities that effect learning ماهي القدرات التي تؤثر في عملية التعلم
    5-What are the perquisites for leaning a skill or information
    ما هي اهم متطلبات حدوث التعلم لمعلومة او مهارة ما

    6-ما هي مميزات و سلبيات النظرية
    WHAT ARE THE ADVANTEGS OR DIS ADVANTEGS OF THE THEORY

    7-What is the role of the teacher vs. learner in this theory

    ثالثا اعدي قائمة بالمقترحات و التعديلات او التطبيقات المناسبة للاستخدام في الفصل الذي تعملين فيه حسب المجموعة العمرية و المكان و النشاط و

  2. Pingback: Learning theories in the eyes of an Instructional Designer – Nataly Moussa

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Information

This entry was posted on January 4, 2014 by in ACTIVE TEACHING,, معلومات مرجعية BASIC KNOWLEDGE.
%d bloggers like this: